If you think those are really dumb statements, I would agree with you. But, when a clandestine organization goes on television with information about one of the constitutional proposals or a candidate; you don’t have the right to know who they are. If you wouldn’t accept advice or trust people in your personal life that you don’t know, why would you trust a group that you know nothing about in your political decisions?That is what has happen during the last election more than any other time in United States history. Claims, accusations and downright lies filed the advertising of the political ads. It should make honest, good people ill. (Yes, everyone, before you get excited, both sides have committed this sin.) But, we didn’t have the chance to evaluate their point of view because we don’t know who provided the financial support for the advertising.
Additionally, people and organizations called “bundlers” skirted campaign laws and used them to hide the source of money for candidates and parties. Many of us were upset when we found out that Romney said things in private that were difficult to support in public. Romney himself even said that it could have been said better. But, did any of us find out who was in the room that night (other than the host, a bundler)?Is there anyone that thinks that the “smoked filled rooms” of yore where secret deals were made was the proper way to govern? Well, of course not. If your local politician takes money from an oil company then votes in support of their petition to drill in your neighborhood, wouldn’t you want to know? Do black hooded people stand on the floor of the United States Senate and make a speech about policy? No, because we all demand to know who is speaking.
Yet, we put up with Super PAC's and bundlers that raise, over the last election in this case, literally billions of dollars. This money flows to candidate’s campaigns and their parties like water down a hill, filling the lowest ground. In this case, the money fills the coffers of candidates that are willing to accept every last cent. There are candidates that don’t accept the money blindly, demanding to know where the money came from. But, many of them, I feel confident, feel great pressure to accept the money so they can compete against a foe that does take the money.Don’t be fooled. When people go to the store to buy a stove, they want certain features and they want it to work. No one, let me repeat, no one, gives a dime to any campaign if they don’t think they will get the results they want. Give enough, your voice will be heard. A little more, your plan will be enacted.
The Supreme Court has ruled that money is speech. It is an amplifier to your own voice. This is true. Also, people do have the right to assemble to combine their resources so that their voice will be louder – and delivered with force. But, the voters, as the ultimate decision maker in any policy decision, should have all the information available to make an educated decision.Let's all cry, "Enough of this lunacy!" In a Responsible Community, when someone exercises their right, they are to take responsibility for their action. It is not a violation of someone’s freedom of speech to ask that they take the responsibility to say who they are.
If it takes a new ruling from the Supreme Court to change the current situation, then let’s find a case to carry to their doorstep. If it takes more than that, then let’s change the Constitution.